Re:Silicon Valley Linux Users Group's last use of Symantec
by Etzos on Friday October 07, 2016 @03:14PM
(#12663206)
This seems like a misleading title. The SVLUG isn't closing, it's just their last meeting at Symantec. It seems they don't have another meeting place set up formally yet, but I see no indication that the group is actually closing at all.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley Linux Users Group's last use of Symantec
by makomk on Friday October 07, 2016 @06:36PM
(#12664458)
It's not a guaranteed closure, but if I remember correctly an issue like is what put an end to my local LUG. Finding a new venue is a fair amount of work, and if activity is low and there's no-one interested in co-ordinating the whole thing it's easy for the group to just fade away quietly.
Re:Silicon Valley Linux Users Group's last use of Symantec
by sctb on Friday October 07, 2016 @03:25PM
(#12663299)
Thanks, we've updated the submission title from “Silicon Valley Linux Users Group Is Closing”.
Re:Silicon Valley Linux Users Group's last use of Symantec
by ferdbold on Friday October 07, 2016 @05:34PM
(#12664083)
I wish there was a way for Feedly to update its headlines when articles get updated... is this a problem with RSS in general or are they just lazy about it?
Re:Silicon Valley Linux Users Group's last use of Symantec
by thekevjames on Friday October 07, 2016 @06:05PM
(#12664269)
This is specifically a Feedly issue; see https://feedly.uservoice.com/forums/192636-suggestions/sugge... . As far as I've seen, Feedly doesn't really respond to bug reports like this.
Among other reasons, this is why I've moved away from Feedly to Inoreader (http://www.inoreader.com/),