Re:Google Canceled the Launch of a Robotic Arm
by nitrogen on Thursday October 06, 2016 @03:10PM
(#12655188)
Rant: Sheesh, now even Wikipedia is using full-page JS popups that fail to load and make the page unusable. Seriously webdevs of the world, do we actually test our own work on phones?
At least I was able to see the image first. I was wondering how much of the X-32's shape was constrained by functional requirements, and the same for the Baxter. Can a safer arm be made without looking as you describe?
Re:Google Canceled the Launch of a Robotic Arm
by tlb on Thursday October 06, 2016 @04:55PM
(#12656029)
The X-32 and X-35 were two candidate designs for the Joint Strike Fighter. The X-35 was chosen. They had the same functional requirements, but the X-35 looked less silly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-35
You could easily avoid having a decorative face. The general arm configuration might look OK with some other ID.
Also, its industrial design is really bad. I hate its hulking arms and smiling animated face. It's surprising that you can ruin an industrial product with ugly visual design, but there you are. For another example, see the Boeing X-32. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-32#/media/File:USAF_X...