News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The examined life by vkou on Thursday October 06, 2016 @11:49AM (#12653444)
A far better example would have been trigonometry, or the quadratic formula, or the belligerents of the war of 1812. All of them fascinating subjects, but unlike, say, arithmetic, or compound interest, or a basic understanding of your country's legal system, they are not critical to survival in the modern world. Not to mention that thanks to teach-to-the-standardized-test, students are are criminally underserved in their exposure to them.

I think what most people would define as the "Common Core" of education should be greatly reduced. Instead of keeping students busy by teaching only the very basics of a topic (Oftentimes these basics are also wrong - precisely because there isn't time to dive into the nuances), and then testing them on the memorization of what ends up being largely pointless trivia, we should be taking that time, and push them towards deeper, focused study of subjects that interest them.

If you want to become an engineer, the standard K-12 mathematical education will suit you poorly. If you want to become a photographer, it will also suit you poorly, for entirely different reasons.

Re:The examined life by Shank on Thursday October 06, 2016 @12:19PM (#12653704)
The quadratic formula is a far more pertinent example. Every graphing calculator and computer can calculate the solutions that the quadratic formula provides, without needing to have kids memorize and apply it manually. Yet we test students on memorizing and applying it mechanically without computers or calculators, despite how abundant they are in the real world.