News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Not OK, Google by ethanbond on Thursday October 06, 2016 @08:08AM (#12651734)
What's misleading or fraudulent about those ads? Maybe you mean "morally reprehensible," in which case I ask where you draw the line between the morally reprehensible (auctioning off the method of suicide to a depressed person) and the morally questionable (say, auctioning off the final bankrupting car purchase to a financially irresponsible person)?
Re:Not OK, Google by euyyn on Thursday October 06, 2016 @01:26PM (#12654298)
Detecting misleading and fraudulent ads is just an example of things they wouldn't spend resources on, if following your reasoning of "short-term money is the only thing they care about."

There's not only the "morally reprehensible" metric ("Don't be evil"); there's also the "absolute PR catastrophe" metric that printing such an ad for a rope would mean.