News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by hueving on Thursday October 06, 2016 @01:43AM (#12650462)
Nuclear program != nuclear weapons. See Iran
Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by ryanlol on Thursday October 06, 2016 @02:02AM (#12650527)
Seems intellectually dishonest to accuse honkhonkpants of lying when Rice was claiming they could produce a nuke at any time.
Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by chirau on Thursday October 06, 2016 @10:20AM (#12652631)
'Can produce' and 'has produced' are two very different things.

Just because you can punch me, have already rolled up your sleeve and clenched a fist does not mean you have punched me, does it now?

Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by hyperbovine on Thursday October 06, 2016 @05:40AM (#12651228)
No, she leaves it up to the reader's imagination (note the evocative final sentence) to bridge the inch-wide gap between what she's willing to say, and want she wants to be able to say. Clearly the type of person you want on your board.

And that's a very curious example you cite considering Iran was the place the neocons wanted to invade next under the same set of false pretenses.

Re:An Open Letter From Elizabeth Holmes by ekianjo on Friday October 07, 2016 @12:13PM (#12661789)
> Nuclear program != nuclear weapons. See Iran

The parallel is easy to make. Repeat if often enough and people will end up saying they have nukes.