It's OK to disagree with an author and discuss why you disagree but there's no need to stifle the conversation altogether.
Should we flag invalid arguments? Potentially offensive material? Since you didn't elaborate, other than the 'definitely' qualifier, it's unknown what your beef or overall goal is, here.
"The collapse has coincided with a retreat from marriage (“the proportion of never-married men was over three times higher in 2015 than 1965”), which suggests a broader infantilization."
Sadly, Mr. Will comes from an age with a rather rigid standard for "manhood" - job, wife, big house, 2.5 kids, dog.
Moreover, he forgets that while many people wanted and worked hard for things such as equality, very few considered the possibility that social progress would turn out to be a (nearly) zero-sum game.
Obviously Mr. Will didn't get it. So he blames the victim.
So if a male chooses another path outside of employment he is to be compared to an infant?
This post should be flagged. That is definitely not okay.