News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America’s ‘quiet catastrophe’: Millions of idle men by solipsism on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @09:11PM (#12649353)
Is it just me, or does your comment not parse?

commodities... sufficiently simulating the context in which rewards are pursued by the sort of employment that is strangely absent in the current male labor force

What? What does it mean for commodities to stimulate a context?

Re:America’s ‘quiet catastrophe’: Millions of idle men by internaut on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @09:52PM (#12649591)
He's saying that working men are so looked down upon that the unemployed consider themselves a step above them. A bit like a perverse parody of aristocrats refusing to work.

This is not theoretical, I've seen it, I believe it. It is typical for the middle classes, especially the younger ones and what I can only really call kept women to look down on working class men as being one step removed from the prison population. Possibly feral. Never enlightened.

I think the primary cause is an education system that strongly gave the impression to young people that it was 'Yale or Jail'.

Basically the universities have created a class system by creating a new social class. Unemployment is less egregious than picking up a hammer or spade.

Otherwise you might be one of those ditchdiggers, you know, in "the world needs ditchdiggers too" quote.

Re:America’s ‘quiet catastrophe’: Millions of idle men by golemotron on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @10:15PM (#12649698)
I think it's going to get sorted eventually as most other work automates away. Watch for men taking ditch digging jobs ironically. I give it 5, maybe 10 years.
Re:America’s ‘quiet catastrophe’: Millions of idle men by ipnon on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @11:04PM (#12649925)
Was it Keynes who suggested that governments bury money underground for workers to excavate in the case of chronic mass unemployment?