A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple math errors

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by Paul-ish on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @04:54PM (#12647769)

Is that verbatim?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by dmd on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @05:39PM (#12648147)

Yes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by harry8 on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @07:05PM (#12648744)

Please photograph and publish it. (Pics or it didn't happen?) This debate is important and shouldn't be muddied with hearsay on all sides.

Thanks.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by monochromatic on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @08:49PM (#12649247)

dmd is a respected HNer, so it's inappropriate to question him.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by lifthrasiir on Thursday October 06, 2016 @12:07AM (#12650174)

It is inappropriate to use that fact to dismiss a valid request for the evidence. Being famous in some (possibly popular) website does not mean that one's experience has not been biased.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by cfqycwz on Thursday October 06, 2016 @12:34AM (#12650279)

Go five levels up from your comment and you might find a joke you're missing—unless you're in on it too and it's sailing right over my head

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A bot crawled thousands of studies looking for simple mat... by lifthrasiir on Thursday October 06, 2016 @11:43AM (#12653392)

Oh-kay, now I understood what happened (the fifth level is invisible from the parent comment, ugh). Thank you for pointing out where I screwed up :S

[ Parent | on HN ]