Are RethinkDB and Horizon abandoned?

Re:Are RethinkDB and Horizon abandoned? by robertjpayne on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @06:46AM (#12642828)

Couchbase is a very very different product under the hood. Be aware you have to run Couchbase with their minimum spec cluster requirements ( 3 nodes, tons of CPU and RAM ) just to ensure you don't lose data because it syncs from ram to disk at best every 100ms

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Are RethinkDB and Horizon abandoned? by HodGreeley on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @12:43PM (#12645475)

Hod @ Couchbase here. This is inaccurate. Couchbase does not delay in writing to disk (some other dbs do). You typically want 3 nodes for high availability and failover, but it isn't required. Auto replication can also help avoid loss in many failure scenarios.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Are RethinkDB and Horizon abandoned? by robertjpayne on Wednesday October 05, 2016 @05:55PM (#12648280)

I'd actually love to be proven wrong, Couchbase looks awesome on paper but some Couchbase staff even confirmed this with me here https://forums.couchbase.com/t/persistence-durability-guaren...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Are RethinkDB and Horizon abandoned? by HodGreeley on Thursday October 06, 2016 @11:57AM (#12653513)

This is complicated, because you're intertwining Sync Gateway and Couchbase Server.

Couchbase Server queues writes immediately. The default is to ack once a write is in Server memory, but you can choose other options. See the response from daschl in that thread.

I see what you were trying to get at with your question. I'm not sure we clarified enough what's going on. I'll respond on the forum.

[ Parent | on HN ]