News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G... by 6stringmerc on Tuesday October 04, 2016 @12:09PM (#12636548)
Perhaps, but it is also tainted with, to me, inexplicable craving for attention using methods that aren't aligned with the espoused higher calling of Wikileaks - as in the Sony hack content. That, to me, significantly damaged the remaining credibility of the organization. It may not resonate the same way for everyone, that's fine, I just sincerely disliked that situation.
Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G... by DominikR on Tuesday October 04, 2016 @12:29PM (#12636709)
> That, to me, significantly damaged the remaining credibility of the organization.

WikiLeaks is a media organisation so it will crave for attention as all media does. But please name one single case in which data released by WikiLeaks was bogus.

On the other hand I could bring up hundreds of cases where main stream media has released fake information.

So how exactly do you decide who has credibility and who does not?

Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G... by mattlevan on Tuesday October 04, 2016 @01:10PM (#12637130)
WikiLeaks maintains credibility by being solely and entirely funded by individual contributions from the public.
Re:WikiLeaks plans to release documents on US election and G... by bdhess on Tuesday October 04, 2016 @01:42PM (#12637500)
I don't even understand how you can claim that. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527487045541045754362...