The post-mortem is interesting and drives discussion. This is logically and historically true.
If you look at the other comments here, and in past threads like it, it's obvious that these threads do not.
If you look at the other comments here, and in past threads like it, it's obvious that these threads do not.
I disagree with this. The guidelines refer to Anything that good hackers would find interesting and I certainly think a major outage at the heart of open source software is interesting in that it drives discussion around similar experiences, implications, pre-emptive action and mitigation.