Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Planners Hope

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by segfaults on Monday October 03, 2016 @12:38AM (#12625534)

Why is it always the cold areas? Why can't a tech corridor be further south... :(

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by cylinder on Monday October 03, 2016 @09:58AM (#12627447)

Santa Monica if you can land a job and live/work there is about as good as it gets.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by TheCoelacanth on Monday October 03, 2016 @05:19PM (#12631430)

I wouldn't really consider Vancouver a cold area. It doesn't even have a single month that averages below freezing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by ThePawnBreak on Monday October 03, 2016 @03:39AM (#12625904)

Um...Bay Area?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by segfaults on Monday October 03, 2016 @03:51AM (#12625932)

Bay Area? San Francisco you mean? That's fine :) but a new tech corridor all the way in the north...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by aianus on Monday October 03, 2016 @06:41AM (#12626373)

SF is extremely cold. You can't ever spend the whole day in a t-shirt, not even in the summer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Next Big Tech Corridor? Between Seattle and Vancouver, Pl... by michael_h on Monday October 03, 2016 @10:11AM (#12627528)

Extremely cold is pushing it. Chilly is probably more apt.

It generally has a mid-level UV index, so you feel warm in direct sunlight, but the humidity is very low so the 'breeze' feels cold. Some may find this unpleasant.

[ Parent | on HN ]