News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Twitter deploys its widgets JavaScript by dcherman on Saturday October 01, 2016 @09:32PM (#12620686)
It's not a hack at all for resources you control - in fact, it's encouraged to do so in order to use very long lived Expires headers while still being able to deploy new versions of your app.

It doesn't work for unversioned library code though where you want to automatically upgrade all users of your code as is the case with Twitter it looks like.

Re:How Twitter deploys its widgets JavaScript by tarancato on Sunday October 02, 2016 @06:00AM (#12621679)
Problem with these is that many caching proxies consider all resources with a query string to be dynamically generated and won't cache them at all, which in the case of js/css/etc is bad
Re:How Twitter deploys its widgets JavaScript by dcherman on Sunday October 02, 2016 @01:39PM (#12623391)
Sure, but that's easily solvable by versioning assets in the filename itself. That's how the `filerev` task works for both Grunt and Gulp.