News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change. Parent comment

Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by icebraining on Saturday October 01, 2016 @02:22PM (#12619171)
Internal forks are not subject to the GPL requirements anyway, so that can't be an argument against it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by cyphar on Saturday October 01, 2016 @09:32PM (#12620685)
In fact, licenses that do not permit private copies of the modified software are not considered free software according to the FSF[1] (which I agree with).

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#NonFreeSof...

[ Parent | on HN ]