News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by tingol on Saturday October 01, 2016 @01:11PM (#12618779)
What makes you think of all the things ignoring the licenses (citation needed) is the one that made github flourish?
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by freedomtaco on Saturday October 01, 2016 @02:41PM (#12619265)
I won't bother contributing to a project if I have to jump through hoops. The Github ecosystem removes these hoops. The license is a secondary concern for in-house software.
Re:Theo de Raadt on LLVM license change by tingol on Saturday October 01, 2016 @03:29PM (#12619484)
I still don't see what you mean by this. All of the top projects on github have pretty clear licenses which are automatically accepted by you (the contributor).

In fact if you choose not to specify a license your work counts as copyrighted (as per github licensing documentation). So Github doesn't really remove any "hoops".