Re:Navy Eliminating 241-Year-Old Rating System in New Enlist...
by Normal_gaussian on Friday September 30, 2016 @05:01AM
(#12611295)
> However, the ratings system became more complicated as the pace of technology quickened, creating churn in the jobs in the service.
> Ratings would be created, merge and become obsolete sometimes in the span of only a few years.
The previous choice of naming is interesting. It was once described to me as a system that allows clear identification of a mans speciality - and likely his only skill - up front.
Re:Navy Eliminating 241-Year-Old Rating System in New Enlist...
by AEDELGOD on Friday September 30, 2016 @01:01PM
(#12613663)
This is a shitty idea. I hope they get rid of SECNAV Mabus. It actually makes the system more complicated, destroys tradition, and he's just doing it for political correctness. Which, may I add, was a huge fail in itself because he's still using SeaMAN instead of SeaPERSON which he was whining about doing because the Navy is hiring pussies now.
The previous choice of naming is interesting. It was once described to me as a system that allows clear identification of a mans speciality - and likely his only skill - up front.