News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous?. Parent comment

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by jsprogrammer on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @05:41PM (#12601583)
Where have those physics been documented?

I want to see the same person:

    'immobile
    'sitting most of the time, with short commutes and shopping trips
    'intensely exercising 1 hr a day
    'actively working out throughout the day
while maintaining their current diet and weight.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by schrodinger on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @10:01PM (#12602835)
These aren't independent variables. The point is that a half an hour run only burns around 300-400 calories, a deficit which could more easily be accomplished by diet. Also, it's possible that the run would increase your appetite.

The point isn't that exercise _can't_ work, it's that aiming for dietary changes has a higher average ROI than exercise.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by jsprogrammer on Thursday September 29, 2016 @01:37AM (#12603473)
"these"? I don't know what that refers to.

No one has argued that there is a lower than average ROI (you get paid for not eating?) from exercise.

[ Parent | on HN ]