Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx
by djsumdog on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @07:39PM
(#12602223)
I think you have that backwards. Unions work best for unskilled work. They're not really necessary in most skilled jobs where worker demand is high and wages are competitive.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx
by Chinjut on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @08:03PM
(#12602337)
There are many skilled professions which are highly unionized; e.g., the various TV and film production unions. Which professions are and aren't unionized is, to a large extent, just a quirk of historical circumstance.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx
by eternalban on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @08:06PM
(#12602346)
Unions are a collective bargaining mechanism.
> unskilled
http://www.alpa.org/about-alpa/what-we-do
> necessary
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/01/15/415m-settlement-...
This is even assuming that Amazon directly employs their delivery drivers. I know Google delivery uses contract drivers in Chicago. I wouldn't be surprised if Amazon has a similar set up in some places. It's pretty hard to organize when you are the driver.
Regardless, Amazon will fight tooth-and-nail to prevent unions from forming. They've successfully done so at their warehouses, and I don't see why deliveries would be any different. See this article by the NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/technology/amazon-proves-i...