News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by rotwoof on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:31PM (#12600562)
The point of putting butter in your coffee is to extend your natural faste. The faste that you enter every night during sleep. It is done in tandem with also skipping breakfast on keto.

The reason you put butter in your coffee instead of a spoonful of say, sugar, is that fat takes a long time to digest and even a fairly small amount of it (a table spoon of butter in your coffee) takes a while to digest. During that time period your hunger sensation is suppressed.

Coffee also promotes weight loss because it speeds up your metabolism. The idea behind buttered coffee is fairly simple. Put enough fat in your coffee so that you don't get hungry and eat a meal and you help extend your natural faste - and your morning coffee helps speed up your metabolism.

http://paleonick.com/articles/Bullet-Proof-Coffee

There are good reasons for drinking buttered coffee even if you're deliberately trying to avoid weight loss i.e you are following a net neutral or net positive caloric intake diet. When you're fasting your body isn't spending energy digesting food which means less of your body's immediately available resources aren't spent digesting food.

Even if you're getting calories from your coffee it doesn't impact your weight loss because you're still eating less calories than your body needs to maintain the weight.

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by danielvinson on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @05:10PM (#12601393)
> Even if you're getting calories from your coffee it doesn't impact your weight loss because you're still eating less calories than your body needs to maintain the weight.

This is completely dependent on other factors. Weight loss is dependent on a hell of a lot of things in tandem. It is mathematically strictly better to say, drink only black coffee or sugar-free energy drinks in the morning. Caffeine is an appetite suppressant. The difference is that most people don't have the personal willpower to stick to the fasting without a few calories to help them along.

Weight loss in general is precisely mathematical in pacing and it will absolutely make you lose weight faster if you consume less calories.

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by jtrtoo on Thursday September 29, 2016 @12:35AM (#12603327)
This assumes calories are all equal and the best measuring stick. Do we know this to be a fact?
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by ars on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @05:21PM (#12601470)
> The difference is that most people don't have the personal willpower to stick to the fasting without a few calories to help them along.

You are ignoring an important factor: If you don't have enough calories the body will switch to starvation mode, you'll have low energy, be cold, etc.

The net result is that, unless you are actually starving (which is bad for you), you'll actually lose less weight that way!

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by danielvinson on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @06:25PM (#12601837)
> If you don't have enough calories the body will switch to starvation mode

This is a myth which has been proved to be absolutely false. You are simply wrong if you are basing any conclusions at all of of this.

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by ars on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @06:44PM (#12601959)
> proved to be absolutely false

I'm perfectly willing to be shown that I'm wrong, but I'll need more than just a sentence from you saying so.

You said "proved" - can you show me the proof?

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by a_brawling_boo on Friday September 30, 2016 @12:06PM (#12613287)
Dr. Jason Fung has done extensive research and experiments on this topic including fasting. You can read his research in his book obesity code. Very eye opening.
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by danielvinson on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @06:51PM (#12601999)
A quick google search results in multiple well cited articles discussing it.
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by schrodinger on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @09:55PM (#12602809)
I'm sure it could also yield multiple well-cited articles on the other side as well. It would be much more helpful to actually provide some research that you stand behind.
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by BlackJack on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @11:38PM (#12603139)
Lyle McDonald: http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/meal-freque...

Probably the best and most researched article on this.

Bullet point 4 here: http://www.leangains.com/2010/10/top-ten-fasting-myths-debun... has an article reference.

Basically, you can certainly go into starvation mode, but not in any reasonable amount of time. Skipping meals or even fasting for a whole day will not cause "starvation mode". Prolonged calorie restriction can affect hormones like Leptin and affect energy expenditure.

Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by DrScump on Thursday September 29, 2016 @04:25AM (#12603954)
Bear in mind that Lyle believed in "starvation mode" 10-17 years ago; I believe he mentions it in his first book. He was also a firm believer in strict caloric arithmetic and that microbiome didn't matter. His content is only as good as the current scientific literature is, and that has changed a lot in the past 20 years.
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by Asooka on Thursday September 29, 2016 @02:58AM (#12603691)
A quick Google search also shows several well cited articles supporting the flat earth theory.
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by NotSammyHagar on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @06:41PM (#12601945)
why do you use the word faste? Does it mean something different from the usual word related to not eating, "fast"?
Re:Fat-fueled brain: unnatural or advantageous? by sp3000 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @05:09PM (#12601386)
I've been reading about bulletproof coffee, and the more I read, the more unsure I am about it. I think the following article makes good points:

https://authoritynutrition.com/3-reasons-why-bulletproof-cof...

I guess it might seem specifically OK for people on Keto diets only, but still, it seems worrisome longterm.