News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stali: A new static Linux distribution. Parent comment

Re:Stali: A new static Linux distribution by qznc on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @06:28AM (#12596608)
I guess the "suckless" answer would be to not use OpenSSL.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stali: A new static Linux distribution by spoiler on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @07:28AM (#12596853)
Who knows, we might soon get SuckleSSL. :)

Jokes aside, they have a bizarre philosophy and attitude, especially when you consider their software is most of the time buggy, and… Well, sucky.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stali: A new static Linux distribution by degobah on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @10:52AM (#12598094)
It's hard to take them seriously when they include statements like this on their FAQ: "Of course Ulrich Drepper thinks that dynamic linking is great, but clearly that’s because of his lack of experience and his delusions of grandeur."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stali: A new static Linux distribution by JdeBP on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @07:42AM (#12596913)
Per http://suckless.org/rocks you appear to have guessed correctly.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stali: A new static Linux distribution by hollerith on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @09:28AM (#12597419)
OK, then same question about whatever SSL library it does use.
[ Parent | on HN ]