Re:Airlines Embrace Pollution Plan That Could Cost Them $24B
by phkahler on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @09:10AM
(#12589310)
Since this is an international agreement, you'd have to tax ALL carbon producers around the world. How you divide that tax revenue between the different countries would then be a political game but much simpler than creating a whole new market for carbon credits. Again, tax the carbon at the source and it won't matter weather it's refined, burned directly, or turned into plastic products, carbon out of the ground will all be taxed at the same rate to discourage it's unearthing. You say I'm oversimplifying a complex issue, but I'd argue that others are making it a complex issue when in fact it's conceptually very simple.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Airlines Embrace Pollution Plan That Could Cost Them $24B
by lmm on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @04:06AM
(#12596124)
> Again, tax the carbon at the source and it won't matter weather it's refined, burned directly, or turned into plastic products, carbon out of the ground will all be taxed at the same rate to discourage it's unearthing.
Doesn't that create the wrong incentives? Digging up carbon and using it to make stuff that is kept around indefinitely / recycled into more stuff / buried when life-expired should be fine - it's putting it into the atmosphere that we want to discourage.
(Also there should be a positive incentive for taking carbon out of the atmosphere permanently).