News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by danieltillett on Monday September 26, 2016 @10:11PM (#12587046)
Masters programs are run as a cash cows for many universities to be filled will anyone who can fog a mirror. As a former academic I can tell you that there are literally different marking criteria for overseas masters students than local undergraduates.
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by DavidHm on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @05:24AM (#12588298)
That is fascinating.

Anecdotally, in European universities, bachelors are the "get in as many people as we can for the tuition fees", while masters are the "let's be as selective as we can get away with".

Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by palunon on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @10:17AM (#12589712)
Sometimes it's even worse... For example, in France, a university is required by law not to be selective for it's first year programs, as long as the candidate graduated high school.
Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by DavidHm on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @11:22AM (#12598361)
So...what is that, first come first served basis?

I assume there's an upper limit on the number of students an university can take in for the first year, determined by staff and classroom availability.

Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by shostack on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @03:19AM (#12587942)
Is that knowledge transparently available to students? How does it impact the curve?

I imagine quite many would be upset if they found out they were not being held to equal standards, and would probably point to foreign students paying more as the reason.

Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by danieltillett on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @04:01AM (#12588055)
>Is that knowledge transparently available to students? How does it impact the curve?

Of course not. You find out when the head of school tells you that it is your fault that all the masters students failed the subject and that you need to fix the situation. If you are dumb enough to ignore the hint the head of school gets someone else to re-mark the exams - either way the cash keeps flowing.

Re:U.S. regulators accuse Palantir of bias against Asians by daemin on Tuesday September 27, 2016 @05:26AM (#12588305)
Yep, that's how I remember it in Australia. The honours students had more respect and were more skilled than the masters students.