News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing .NET Standard by dragonwriter on Monday September 26, 2016 @06:54PM (#12586316)
> So, do we have ".NET Standard" now and ".NET Standard 2.0" in the future?

There are three key versions (and several others; they have 1.0 through 1.6 and 2.0) of .NET Standard referenced; the key versions are 1.5 (supported by .NET Framework 4.6.2 and later and .NET Core 1.0 and later), 1.6 (supported by .NET Framework vNext and later and .NET Core 1.0 and later), and 2.0 (supported by .NET Framework 4.6.1 and later and .NET Core vNext and later).

Re:Introducing .NET Standard by Someone on Monday September 26, 2016 @07:21PM (#12586446)
So, in a blog post titled "Introducing .NET Standard", it turns out .NET Standard already has 8 different versions?

Also, rereading the article, I notice "When we shipped .NET Core 1.0, we also introduced .NET Standard."

This text really could do with a good editor.

Re:Introducing .NET Standard by dragonwriter on Monday September 26, 2016 @07:53PM (#12586604)
> it turns out .NET Standard already has 8 different versions?

I think the versions prior to v1.6 were retrospectively defined based on the common capabilities of pre-existing platforms; v1.6 was what .NET Core 1.0 supported and .NET Framework vNext will support (2.0 is what .NET Framework 4.6.1 supports and what .NET Core vNext -- and vNext of MS's other platforms -- will support, and beyond 2.0 there will be more synchronous development across different platforms.)

Re:Introducing .NET Standard by terrajobst on Monday September 26, 2016 @08:07PM (#12586662)
That's exactly what happened, yes.
Re:Introducing .NET Standard by terrajobst on Monday September 26, 2016 @08:07PM (#12586666)
That's actually a fair point. I probably should have used a different wording.