Re:SpaceX is testing new powerful engines for its mission to...
by kinkrtyavimoodh on Monday September 26, 2016 @02:49PM
(#12584523)
The GP was mostly downvoted because of the unnecessarily supercilious tone. Instead of explaining why they thought Venus was better for this purpose, GP just chose to end with a haughty-sounding "I don't think they have thought this through." Considering GP is a random stranger on the internet, and "they" is SpaceX/Elon, the downvoting is natural.
Re:SpaceX is testing new powerful engines for its mission to...
by RobertoG on Monday September 26, 2016 @03:03PM
(#12584640)
Maybe. But I think that it's, precisely, because we are random strangers in the Internet and we all know how easy is to misunderstand intentions by text, that we should think two times before downvoting.
It's my personal opinion that downvoting is used too easily in HN.
Sometimes it seems that we are trying to filter opinions that we don't agree with, instead of policing good manners and filter irrelevant to the subject comments.
It seems the conditions in the upper atmosphere of Venus are acceptable. If you can manage living in floating cities (that it's cool but makes it a very difficult endeavour) then, Venus is close to Earth than Mars and the gravity is similar to the one in Earth.
As always, Wikipedia have this covered: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_Venus#Aerostat...
PS: I'm upvoting the GP, by the way. Why people downvote instead of asking for clarification.