News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Autism and Evolution by CuriouslyC on Monday September 26, 2016 @12:37PM (#12583305)
My guess is that the mutations are retained as variation in the population because having some small subset of them probably results in divergent thinking which can increase overall group survival. Autistic spectrum disorder individuals result from having too many of these mutations, such that neural activity patterns find a stable equilibrium outside of "normal" (think strange attractors in system dynamics).
Re:Autism and Evolution by azakai on Monday September 26, 2016 @01:04PM (#12583538)
A reasonable theory, but as a minor note most evolutionary biologists wouldn't focus on group survival. Group selection remains controversial.

But your point still stands, and has clear parallels in other cases, like sickle-cell anemia: one copy of the gene is helpful, so it remains in the population, but two copies is harmful, so its spread is limited.

Re:Autism and Evolution by jawarner on Monday September 26, 2016 @07:07PM (#12586383)
I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but this article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_game_theory) mentions Hamilton's rule: A given altristic gene will propogate if "the genetic relatedness of the altruistic donor exceeds the cost-benefit ratio of the altruistic act itself". Is this not widely agreed upon?