News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on OpenSSL Security Advisory - 26 Sep 2016. Parent comment

Re:OpenSSL Security Advisory - 26 Sep 2016 by eis on Monday September 26, 2016 @10:18AM (#12581970)
Sigh. Please improve your reading comprehension. I didn't "shit on the LibreSSL developers". Anyways, you sound not like someone one can have a sensible conversation with. So I wont be replying further.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenSSL Security Advisory - 26 Sep 2016 by omginternets on Monday September 26, 2016 @10:35AM (#12582140)
Don't worry, the rest of us get it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenSSL Security Advisory - 26 Sep 2016 by OrpheanBeholder on Monday September 26, 2016 @12:11PM (#12583037)
Okay, let's have a sensible conversation about your completely idle suggestion to create a new library in some other language, that would have to maintain compatibility with the OpenSSL API otherwise no one will use it, or rewrite everything that currently uses OpenSSL.

To me your "LibreSSL is no such thing" came across as dismissing the efforts of LibreSSL, even though it's not vunerable to this latest one, because it doesn't use Erlang.

[ Parent | on HN ]