News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UnGoogled Chromium: Chromium with enhanced privacy, contr... by ZoF on Monday September 26, 2016 @04:18AM (#12580131)
You have no evidence he is closer to the former and all this is is justification for cultural Marxism.

The only thing that an individual should be judged on at work is actions/comments/etc. made at work.

If you'd like to argue otherwise I'd hope you at least have something more formally define-able than 'he was trending towards being a neo-nazi'. I'd also expect you to be able to point to an authority for defining these ideological limits other than the currently loosely defined group-think.

Please answer these few scenarios:

-Should someone believing and actively promoting pro-life stances(outside of work) be fired?

-Should a casual narcotics user on weekends be fired once it's found out he/she uses?

-Should someone be fired for having a confederate flag hanging in their living room? What if they're black?

Re:UnGoogled Chromium: Chromium with enhanced privacy, contr... by orf on Monday September 26, 2016 @04:42AM (#12580244)
Nobody black would hang a confederate flag in their living room.
Re:UnGoogled Chromium: Chromium with enhanced privacy, contr... by ZoF on Monday September 26, 2016 @04:46AM (#12580269)
Ironically I asked that the because the black people living in the apartment next to me do have a confederate flag in their living room(among _many_ others).

They also scream white power around the campfire when drunk though so perhaps not typical.