News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux RAID is different from Windows for sound technical ... by MichaelGG on Friday September 23, 2016 @08:57PM (#12568943)
Yes Windows has had RAID for a long time. There has been various limitations. I don't think you can boot a RAID 0 volume, for instance. It's certainly not as flexible as Linux's model, but Windows usually isn't.

As far as hardware RAID controllers, at least you get a battery-backed write cache that will "just work" without the OS, right? As in, you don't need to boot the OS to finish flushing. Or maybe I've just bought into the hardware RAID marketing. It does seem simpler, as in less to deal with, to let the card do it and just present whatever volumes desired to the OS.

Re:Linux RAID is different from Windows for sound technical ... by cm2187 on Saturday September 24, 2016 @03:36AM (#12569902)
My time playing with hardware RAID cards is over. My disks spent their time dropping on different builds (even with TLER disks only). For a home NAS, a synology style linux software RAID with regular data scrubbing is the peace of mind solution. For the cache problem, a cheap UPS that lasts the few minutes required to gracefully shut down is a good enough solution. As for performance, my bottleneck is the 1 gigabit port on my laptop anyway. And I don't see any improvement on the horizon for that anyway.
Re:Linux RAID is different from Windows for sound technical ... by sliken on Saturday September 24, 2016 @03:43AM (#12569924)
I believe you mean a cheap UPS. A cheap PSU is likely to last a very small fraction of a second in an outage.
Re:Linux RAID is different from Windows for sound technical ... by cm2187 on Saturday September 24, 2016 @03:48AM (#12569942)
Corrected. Thanks!