Re:Oracle’s Cloudy Future
by TeMPOraL on Thursday September 22, 2016 @03:59PM
(#12559836)
Indeed. It seems that the most sustainable business model for Open Source so far is a combination of FOSS product + paid support / consulting company. It has some potential conflict of interest (e.g. deliberately not improving some aspects of the product that brings in support calls), but being a successful open-source product often depends on outside contributions which themselves depend on reputation, and that may keep companies honest.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> It has some potential conflict of interest (e.g. deliberately not improving some aspects of the product that brings in support calls)
You could say the same about proprietary software, no?
Yes. I was stating they exist, not comparing to propertiary software.
That still doesn't work because the core issue is partially addressed.
Reliable on call support. Oracle is not going to vanish overnight or de prioritize you due to lack of resources.
The possibility of that risk in other firms is sufficient to make them non options
Re:Oracle’s Cloudy Future
by nickpsecurity on Thursday September 22, 2016 @11:17PM
(#12562082)
Many of the companies making proprietary products with high lockin have terrible support just because they know you cant leave. Whereas it's the opposite for some startups and FOSS companies knowing how easy it is for them to loose business. So, I dont buy that as an advantage of companies like Oracle.
You want support for sure but big companies are hit and miss on support quality.