This might not deter people from using Tor entirely, but at least they'd understand the threat model a bit better so they could change their behavior accordingly, for instance maybe not using it at their own home, not using it for Facebook, etc.
As much as we might want to believe that we can code our way out of anything, human rights demands more than software.
Just out of curiosity and for purely educational purposes (I admittedly know very little about the topic), how about something like I2P or FreeNet? Are these at all viable alternatives?
What other choices do we have for "anonymity" outside of the usual VPN/Proxy?
I like I2P as it has a reduced threat footprint compared to Tor as it's all internal, but it's also a smaller network, probably more vulnerable to Sybil, less audited code, etc.
Again, my point is that there is no perfect solution, it all depends on the situation and the requirements.
What is the inherently secure alternative available to these vulnerable people?
> I really hope the new boards steers them back to the academic realm and slaps a big red USE AT YOUR OWN RISK warning on the tin.
What causes you to believe that activists and vulnerable people would stop using Tor if this warning were in place?