Approve or Reject: Can You Moderate Five New York Times Comments?

Re:Approve or Reject: Can You Moderate Five New York Times C... by empath75 on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @04:02PM (#12551724)

metafilter.com has a $5 lifetime fee to sign up. They have an extremely strict moderation policy and fairly frequently ban people who don't interact in positive ways, almost always refunding the sign-up fee. They have one of the most readable comments sections of any site i read, although it has it's own problems.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Approve or Reject: Can You Moderate Five New York Times C... by JoelBennett on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @06:05PM (#12552690)

In that regard, I've been kind of curious to know how Hacker News deals with comments. It seems like there's only a single upvote button (no downvoting), and you can't see how much something has been upvoted. It kind of kills the popularity contest part of things.

The whole psychology of online commenting and having groups rate things is quite interesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Approve or Reject: Can You Moderate Five New York Times C... by Yen on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @06:17PM (#12552776)

I believe there is a 'downvote' button, but it's only available once you've scored above a certain karma threshold.

Also, while you don't know how often something has been upvoted, a comment with a higher score will be at the top of the page, and you'll see it first and be more likely to give it an additional upvote.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Approve or Reject: Can You Moderate Five New York Times C... by siegecraft on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @05:03PM (#12552222)

The comments are civil, but lack a certain diversity of thought, to put it politely.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Approve or Reject: Can You Moderate Five New York Times C... by empath75 on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @05:17PM (#12552325)

I agree, and it's why I stop posting there, but I don't think that's necessarily a problem. Not every opinion needs to be expressed everywhere.

[ Parent | on HN ]