News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by 0xmohit on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:36AM (#12547991)
> just keep it accessible only to me

One could also argue that the service is free and the service provider needs a (or yet another) way to monetize it.

If the privacy settings are insecure by default, one shouldn't have high expectations anyways.

Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by jtrip on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:46AM (#12548078)
And that's a little scary, you sell a bit of yourself to get access to a service. It's not really the best case scenario I would want.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by xenadu02 on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @11:52AM (#12549322)
> One could also argue that the service is free and the service provider needs a (or yet another) way to monetize it.

True, which is why I pay Apple money. No incentive to mine my data... in fact given that privacy is a big marketing angle Apple's incentives are to make it impossible for them to access your data even if subpoenaed or presented with a warrant.