News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by sidlls on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @08:20AM (#12547478)
Perhaps it's some kind of homeomorphic encryption scheme. Hey it technically leaves the original message encrypted!
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by Filligree on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:13AM (#12547819)
Ifmeaningful homomorphic encryption was an option, then we'd be living in a quite different world.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by sanxiyn on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:35AM (#12547987)
Surprisingly, homomorphic encryption is now practical enough to run a Kaggle-like data science competition, but without disclosing data. At least one such competition is known to run with real money prize.

https://medium.com/@Numerai/encrypted-data-for-efficient-mar...

Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by foresight on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @05:43PM (#12552527)
This reads like fake smoke and mirrors to trick investors/data providers/participants instead of anything that's real cryptographically.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by sidlls on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:21AM (#12547865)
Very true. I was just making a tongue-in-cheek conjecture about the justification/rationalization that might be employed.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by spaceheeder on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @11:34AM (#12549130)
As rad as it would be if Google started doing privacy-friendly-ish datamining on user data by homomorphically encrypting it, you and I both know that's not what they're doing. You forgot the `/s`, sadly.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea... by puzzle on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @02:59PM (#12551183)
Along those lines, there's RAPPOR:

http://research.google.com/pubs/pub42852.html