Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by sidlls on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @08:20AM
(#12547478)
Perhaps it's some kind of homeomorphic encryption scheme. Hey it technically leaves the original message encrypted!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by Filligree on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:13AM
(#12547819)
Ifmeaningful homomorphic encryption was an option, then we'd be living in a quite different world.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by sanxiyn on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:35AM
(#12547987)
Surprisingly, homomorphic encryption is now practical enough to run a Kaggle-like data science competition, but without disclosing data. At least one such competition is known to run with real money prize.
https://medium.com/@Numerai/encrypted-data-for-efficient-mar...
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by foresight on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @05:43PM
(#12552527)
This reads like fake smoke and mirrors to trick investors/data providers/participants instead of anything that's real cryptographically.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by sidlls on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:21AM
(#12547865)
Very true. I was just making a tongue-in-cheek conjecture about the justification/rationalization that might be employed.
Re:Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy fea...
by spaceheeder on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @11:34AM
(#12549130)
As rad as it would be if Google started doing privacy-friendly-ish datamining on user data by homomorphically encrypting it, you and I both know that's not what they're doing. You forgot the `/s`, sadly.