News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by lisper on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @07:18PM (#12544183)
That's not quite true. It's a particularly high quality of ink-jet print. You can easily tell the difference between a giclee and the output of an HP OfficeJet.
Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by TeMPOraL on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @07:42PM (#12544296)
Since we're talking art and commerce, I smell a business opportunity - selling inkjet printers with Giclée Enabled™ label, at extra markup.
Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by l0b0 on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @02:46AM (#12545937)
From Wikipedia (and professional photographers I've spoken to mirror this sentiment), “since [giclée] is an unregulated word it has no associated warranty of quality.” It's like “premium”.
Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by klodolph on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @08:13PM (#12544451)
It's still the same process. The printers used to make "giclée" printes are ordinary inkjet printers, they're just not HP OfficeJet printers—probably.
Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by lisper on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @09:05PM (#12544689)
Depends on what you consider "ordinary". A giclee printer can fill a room and cost many thousands of dollars. e.g.:

http://www.adorama.com/iesp20000.html?gclid=CNz7x4-in88CFQqE...

Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by klodolph on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @12:00AM (#12545279)
I have a similar printer.

The word "giclee" does not even appear in the description, but "inkjet" does. It's still an ordinary injet printer. It's bigger and more accurate than most. I've never seen them put in rooms so small that they'd "fill the room", I've usually seen them in rooms with several printers.

Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by lisper on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @01:12AM (#12545584)
> It's bigger and more accurate than most.

Then it isn't ordinary.

Re:Show HN: Primitive Pictures by glial on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @07:31PM (#12544251)
Also it's often done on some type of canvas.