News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by generj on Monday September 19, 2016 @10:22PM (#12536545)
Yeah, a private email account which was used extensively for official government business.

With no work email account ever setup.

It's a matter of law that any and all work related emails on a personal email address are to be handed over for future FOIA requests, etc. upon leaving office.

If I used my personal email address for all communication with my companies clients for work, they'd demand all of those emails when I left the company.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by mozumder on Monday September 19, 2016 @10:47PM (#12536635)
> If I used my personal email address for all communication with my companies clients for work, they'd demand all of those emails when I left the company.

But they wouldn't be able to get them, no matter how hard they demanded.

Personal email addresses exist. Companies have to deal with that fact.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @12:04AM (#12536972)
> But they wouldn't be able to get them, no matter how hard they demanded

I work in securities. My work emails must be archived. If I send work email from my personal email (a) that is potentially illegal and (b) I must promptly turn them over to my archives. If I refuse b, I face civil and potentially criminal censure.

Blows me away how finance has stricter controls than the people conducting bombing raids.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by snowwrestler on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @01:02AM (#12537184)
This is not a relevant analogy because it's not under dispute that Clinton used her email address for personal conversations, and there is nothing in the Reddit post or the Hill news story that indicates whether we're talking about personal or official business emails.

If your employer tried to force Gmail to turn over to them all your emails with your spouse and friends, no matter the subject or content, you and Google would fight it. And rightly so.

The House GOP members of the Benghazi committee are trying their hardest to get their hands on Clinton's personal emails, to dig for embarrassing messages to release. They already have her official business emails; they have had them for years. And they have openly admitted that the entire purpose of the committee is to undercut her presidential campaign.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by ars on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @02:39AM (#12537590)
> They already have her official business emails; they have had them for years.

No, they have the emails she claims are official. Big difference.

And she has zero credibility here. Negative credibility even, if she claims they have all the official emails you can be 100% sure they do not.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by snowwrestler on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @10:49AM (#12539925)
So says you, but thankfully the law holds itself to a higher standard. Specifically, the law requires evidence of criminal activity to begin a criminal prosecution.

Your standard is that any time someone claims something, we can all act like the opposite of that claim is true, even if there is no actual evidence. By that standard, everyone is guilty until proven innocent. Again, thankfully, the law does not work that way.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by mozumder on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @02:48AM (#12537641)
And if they want more, they can always get a search warrant for them.

That would help the Republicans gain back some credibility if they did. Right now everyone considers this a colossal waste of time, exemplary of Republican waste.

Republicans are quickly finding that there are limits to their political powers.

The public needs to be forceful in telling the House to stop wasting government money on Hillary emails.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by ars on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @03:17AM (#12537749)
> And if they want more, they can always get a search warrant for them.

How would that help? She deleted them.

> The public needs to be forceful in telling the House to stop wasting government money on Hillary emails.

No, they need to tell the House that Hillary should be indited, that she is not above the rules.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by mozumder on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @10:06AM (#12539571)
> How would that help? She deleted them.

Sucks for them, then. Perhaps the House Republicans should have been quicker on their feet, instead of clowning around?

The public is in support of Clinton, and want House Republican members impeached and jailed.

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by seanot on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @06:56AM (#12538511)
But the people running bombing raids regulate the securities industry. Therefore, they make the rules. This ain't Plato and Aristotle's polis.
Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by generj on Monday September 19, 2016 @11:05PM (#12536699)
Oh, yes they could.

The easiest route would simply be to refuse me referrals. If I had a golden parachute deal, it would be invalidated by such an action. Any vested stocks I had would be in jeopardy. They can try to blackball me. They can cut off insurance benefits unexpectedly.

And all that before lawyers get involved...

If you do work on a personal email, your employer may later demand access to those emails. So don't do it.