House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's email server

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by umanwizard on Monday September 19, 2016 @09:36PM (#12536335)

> The point I'm making is that I don't think you, or anybody else actually cares about the emails

Based on what evidence?

> they care it's something they can criticize Clinton for.

I'm no fan of Trump either. I wish Clinton were a good candidate so she would wipe the floor with him.

> So of course nobody complained about it with Bush, because nobody cares about them.

I was 12 years old when Bush was elected. That's why I didn't care about whatever he may or may not have done.

You know absolutely nothing about me or anyone else and you are presuming people's motives without any evidence or justification.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by Retric on Monday September 19, 2016 @09:54PM (#12536425)

Based on nobody criticizing the several prior people in that same position that did the exact same thing.

Sure, if it was just one or two that's one thing, but A email is public in the first place and B when your the fifth person in a row to do something you generally assume that's just how it's done.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by newman314 on Monday September 19, 2016 @11:12PM (#12536733)

Does not make it right (for anyone). Equal rules should apply.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:House panel looking into Reddit post about Clinton's emai... by oh_sigh on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @11:51AM (#12540441)

Is there as much evidence available with bush as there is with HRC?

[ Parent | on HN ]