Re:Improving license and patent issues in the LLVM community
by starseeker on Monday September 19, 2016 @09:41PM
(#12536354)
Google turns up these:
https://www.google.com/patents/US5628016
https://www.google.com/patents/US6247169
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070016894A1
I'm not sure about the last one since it's an apparently abandoned application rather than a granted patent...
Interestingly, US6247169 reports "lapsed" on the google page due to non-payment of fees...
I'm really not sure what to make of US5628016 - it's filing date is in 1994, but there's a report of a 2015 "Assignment" legal event.
(edit - fixed links)
Re:Improving license and patent issues in the LLVM community
by jabl on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @02:35AM
(#12537575)
You already got answers for SEH. For Steensgard, see the paper at https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/pingali/CS380C/2007fa/papers... (no idea about the patent itself, but the paper is probably easier to read).
What's that?