News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Music theory for nerds by jacobolus on Monday September 19, 2016 @06:05PM (#12535158)
They’re not remotely “intuitive”. They only make sense to someone with years of training.

If instead you used digits from –5 to 6, using arithmetic mod 12, it becomes obvious that e.g.:

  -2 + -3 = -5
  4 + 3 = -5
  5 + 5 = -2
  -5 + -1 = 6
  4 + -3 = 1
  etc.
The “perfect” intervals are just ±5 (ratios very close to 3:2 and 4:3). The “major” intervals are –3, –1, 2, 4 (approx. ratios of 5:3, 15:8, 9:8, 5:4). The “minor” intervals are –4, –2, 1, 3 (approx. ratios of 8:5, 16:9, 16:15, 6:5).

Then it’s easy to see that your “major + minor = perfect” formula only works for some intervals, Etc. Overall the simple heuristics are more obfuscatory than helpful IMO.

Re:Music theory for nerds by lmm on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @04:43AM (#12538029)
> Then it’s easy to see that your “major + minor = perfect” formula only works for some intervals, Etc.

Where does it go wrong? Do those cases come up in practice?

Counting up and down the scale is a core use case for a notation for intervals. It absolutely needs to be well-supported. A 12-semitone approach is never going to match the usability of even the existing system.

Re:Music theory for nerds by komponisto on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @05:05AM (#12538116)
>A 12-semitone approach is never going to match the usability of even the existing system

I am obliged to point out that a 12-semitone approach is in fact part of the "existing system" (see: pitch-class set theory).

(Mind you, I of course think its usefulness is overrated, because I think the "atonal" repertory is tonal.)