Re:What I Learned from Executing Two Men
by kahrkunne on Monday September 19, 2016 @11:06AM
(#12531966)
One of the major purposes of prisons is deterrence, and for that prisons need to be awful.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
In theory, harsh prison conditions deter would-be criminals.
Do you have any evidence that reality conforms to this theory?
Re:What I Learned from Executing Two Men
by tmptmp on Monday September 19, 2016 @12:42PM
(#12532748)
>>Do you have any evidence that reality conforms to this theory?
Do you have any evidence that reality doesn't conform to this theory?
Not a counter-question just for the sake of counter-questioning; I am sincerely interested in knowing.
Re:What I Learned from Executing Two Men
by orkoden on Monday September 19, 2016 @01:13PM
(#12532963)
The US has harsh sentences and high crime.
Re:What I Learned from Executing Two Men
by 67726e on Monday September 19, 2016 @02:14PM
(#12533425)
Is it possible we would have higher crime with lighter sentences?
Re:What I Learned from Executing Two Men
by tmptmp on Tuesday September 20, 2016 @08:14AM
(#12538875)
This in itself doesn't prove anything. Compared to what it's harsh and high? e.g. China may have harsher sentences and lower crime.
Re:What I Learned from Executing Two Men
by fsloth on Monday September 19, 2016 @03:42PM
(#12534114)
While longer prison sentences do deter crime up to a point (
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2016/03/criminal...) I've not seen any data that would grade effectiveness of prisons based on their awfullness. No matter how "cushy" the prison environment is, it's still a prison.
Awful prisons only dehumanize convicts and guards alike for no purpose.