Re:Google HTML/CSS Style Guide – Omit Optional Tags
by DougWebb on Saturday September 17, 2016 @12:33PM
(#12521166)
If your output is compressed (which it should be if you're worried about response size) then omitting end tags has much less impact, I believe. All of the tags should get compressed well because they're repeated so often, and they should be much smaller overall than your non-repetitive content.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google HTML/CSS Style Guide – Omit Optional Tags
by TheRealPomax on Saturday September 17, 2016 @01:25PM
(#12521410)
But note that on the scale of move as much data around as Google does, or even "the web as a whole", shaving even a few bytes off of every single gzip packet stream can still equate to significant network relief.
Re:Google HTML/CSS Style Guide – Omit Optional Tags
by DougWebb on Saturday September 17, 2016 @01:56PM
(#12521565)
I suspect their advice is for their benefit, not other website devs. They can save a lot of space in their archive if everyone's pages were smaller. Nothing compared to better image compression though.