News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU Court: Open WiFi Operator Not Liable for Pirate Users by ayyn0n0n0 on Friday September 16, 2016 @12:02PM (#12514936)
There are ways to configure your tor exit node ExitPolicy to be responsible and to be pro-active against malicious activity and abuse.

If you would like to read more: http://tornull.org https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExi...

With a minimal amount of work and upkeep. You can cut down on abuse fairly easily.

Re:EU Court: Open WiFi Operator Not Liable for Pirate Users by cryptarch on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:02PM (#12517327)
I was under the impression that this was a dangerous thing to do, because by using custom filtering you implicitly accept responsibility for what illegal content slips through your filter.
Re:EU Court: Open WiFi Operator Not Liable for Pirate Users by cryptarch on Friday September 16, 2016 @07:29PM (#12518145)
I can't edit my post anymore, but I couldn't find a source to back this up. According to the Tor Blog, it should be fine to have a reduced exit policy.

For reference: https://blog.torproject.org/running-exit-node

Re:EU Court: Open WiFi Operator Not Liable for Pirate Users by bluesign on Friday September 16, 2016 @12:15PM (#12515054)
I know but I was referring to identity part;

'in order to ensure that deterrent effect, it is necessary to require users to reveal their identity to be prevented from acting anonymously'

Re:EU Court: Open WiFi Operator Not Liable for Pirate Users by wyager on Friday September 16, 2016 @05:32PM (#12517519)
How do I avoid Tor exit nodes that block "abuse" as defined by copyright barons?