Re:Darpa Contract Awarded to Verify Blockchain-Based Integri...
by stelfer on Thursday September 15, 2016 @04:03PM
(#12509357)
Most people associate "blockchains" with a protocol by which the "blocks" are inserted. Usually these things revolve around proof-of-work, proof-of-stake, proof-of-space, fairness criteria, etc.
I think everyone gets that the Guardtime product is hashtree.
From a formal verification perspective, the critical behavior is probably in the protocol, and most likely not the implementation of the datastructure or database.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Darpa Contract Awarded to Verify Blockchain-Based Integri...
by ristoalas on Friday September 16, 2016 @03:11AM
(#12512389)
One way to look at it is that KSI is a proof of stake blockchain where the stakeholders are (mostly) fixed. Often people would call that a private blockchain (or a consortium blockchain), to use the terminology from the following article:
https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/07/on-public-and-private-b...
Re:Darpa Contract Awarded to Verify Blockchain-Based Integri...
by unboxed_type on Friday September 16, 2016 @10:02AM
(#12514040)
Thanks for that clarification! It is a great pleasure to talk with an knowledgeable person like you.