News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Old Geek by flukus on Thursday September 15, 2016 @06:39AM (#12504808)
On the other hand, most places don't need that level of reliablity. If a company email server went down for a few hours it's not that big a deal. Even for most large corps, only a certain few things need that level of reliability.

I often see it get written into contracts with very little thought as to what it means. You get some great looks from managment when you break the figure down into minutes though, especially when you don't have 24/7 staffing. A poorly timed cosmic ray could ruin your SLA.

* It would where I'm at now, because someone thought it would be a good idea to handle a critical business process by emails csv's.

Re:Old Geek by bandrami on Thursday September 15, 2016 @09:25AM (#12505893)
I've also seen people make the other mistake, though. I've had people screaming about 2 hours of downtime violating our 99.999% SLA, apparently not realizing the five nines means the thing can be down eight hours a year (an entire business day) and still be in spec.
Re:Old Geek by entropy_ on Thursday September 15, 2016 @09:56AM (#12506120)
That's not true. 5 nines, ie 99.999% uptime means that the maximum downtime in a year is about 315 seconds:

60x60x24x365 x (1 - (99.999/100)) = 315.36

Wikipedia confirms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability#Percentage_c...

So yes, 2hrs of downtime would most definitely violate the SLA. The 8 hours you refer to is the figure for 3 nines.

Re:Old Geek by bandrami on Thursday September 15, 2016 @10:42AM (#12506525)
D'oh. It was three nines, thanks