Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by castratikron on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @02:40PM
(#12499984)
It's cheaper only because nobody pays the true cost of transportation. Make gas $8 a gallon to cover for the damage to the environment and suddenly sprawl won't seem so cheap.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by hx87 on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @03:41PM
(#12500546)
In that case everyone in the burbs will just buy a Leaf, Bolt, Volt or Model S/X to bypass the cost of gasoline.
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by Tiktaalik on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @09:38PM
(#12502722)
This is why municipalities are pressing higher order governments to move to comprehensive road pricing instead of gas taxes.
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by hx87 on Thursday September 15, 2016 @10:49AM
(#12506601)
It's a good step forward, as long as the pricing scales with the amount of damage a car does to roads when driven. A heavy truck with skinny tires should pay much more than a 2 door convertible with fat tires. Base it on average recommended tire pressure, perhaps?
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by mjevans on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @04:10PM
(#12500812)
I'd actually like to see the tax on businesses relative to the distance their employees commute. As a bonus, without changing other rules, this also makes part time labor filling a full time job less cost effective.
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by ArkyBeagle on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @04:18PM
(#12500880)
Yep! that's how you do it. But the poor schmoe who has a magnetic sign and ladder on his old pickup will suffer for it, and we have integrated that into our politics. See also Jimmy Carter.
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by castratikron on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @07:19PM
(#12502051)
A big gas tax will hurt rural areas the most. Maybe we could base the tax on the population density of an area, and give electric car tech time to trickle down into less populated regions until we ultimately start turning up the heat there, too.
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by ianai on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @03:31PM
(#12500450)
Last I heard it was more like 16/gal
Re:What If Urban Sprawl Is the Only Realistic Way to Create ...
by 24gttghh on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @03:56PM
(#12500683)
Here's an actual study [1] from 2015, as opposed to hearsay, that suggests +$3.80/gal for gas and +$4.80/gal for diesel to represent the environmental damage.
[1] http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-015-1343-0