Re:Hipmunk (YC S10) Acquired by Concur
by underyx on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @10:57AM
(#12497529)
Alright, this following comment is not an official communication by Kiwi.com, it reflects solely my personal guesses/opinions.
I'm not sure about the details since I don't have much to do with the legal side of things, but I would assume that Kiwi.com had to put this clause in to avoid having to pay when a flight's price is 1000x higher than it should be as an error fare, or similar cases. I've personally never heard of a case where expenses weren't fully covered because of this clause.
I'm not sure about the details since I don't have much to do with the legal side of things, but I would assume that Kiwi.com had to put this clause in to avoid having to pay when a flight's price is 1000x higher than it should be as an error fare, or similar cases. I've personally never heard of a case where expenses weren't fully covered because of this clause.