* https://www.wired.com/2015/11/how-to-get-rid-of-the-iphone-m...
Wired is pointing out that the phone keeps a history of locations. Not Apple. Again, very different from Google's practices.
* http://www.wired.co.uk/article/apple-spies-on-yosemite-searc...
This one was disappointing, and as the comments indicate, contrary to Apple's customary sensitivity around privacy. Also trivially disabled, again, unlike the location tracking the Register is describing here which cannot be turned off.
* https://pando.com/2014/07/28/apple-hit-with-class-action-sui...
Sounds more like a lawsuit driving by misinformation. Show me facts, please.
* http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/04/how-apple-tracks-your-l...
Again, purely data stored on the phone.
* http://www.cultofmac.com/132610/it-took-apple-3-years-to-fix...
Embarrassing, undoubtedly. Again, not Apple data collection.
The tracking absolutely can be turned off. The register's original article is somewhat confused on this.
(disclaimer: googler)
Apple produces and sells premium devices (arguably fashion pieces) at a premium price. They make their money at the point of sale.
Google produces and contracts with manufacturers to produce devices, and provides services. They make their money with ads.
These are both widely known and accepted things, and these mean that Apple has a vested interest to NOT scrape your data, where Google has a vested interest to scrape as much of your data as they can.