News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Marc Andreessen on the atomization of AI. Parent comment

Re:Marc Andreessen on the atomization of AI by Eliezer on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @01:19AM (#12494395)
> Ultimately I find this a bit ridiculous given how vocal some individuals in the tech field are about the 'dangers of Ai'. They harp and harp about what could happen if more capable Ai gets developed but you don't see their money anywhere near the groups doing deeper development in Ai.

...because if you think AGI is dangerous, you should fund groups trying to develop it? I am puzzled by the presentation of this proposition as if it is an absolutely obvious sequitur requiring no defense, such that failure to follow through on it is "ridiculous".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Marc Andreessen on the atomization of AI by outsideline on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @01:34AM (#12494446)
Yep. "The best way to predict the future is to create it"

Don't stretch your mind to far on this one. If someone or various groups develop AGI and you have no stake in them, you will have no say in how it gets used. For once, people need to be honest with themselves about this.

You're not going to be able to dictate from a third party consortium of PhDs how someone should run their company or develop their software.

[ Parent | on HN ]