News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by mindslight on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @01:37PM (#12490500)
IMHO, at this level binary compatibility isn't important. Linux could be easily ported to run on any ISA.

The problems are economies of scale and the perfect being the enemy of the good. What is the interest in an expensive custom chip when you still can't trust that it wasn't compromised by the fab?

Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by effie on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @05:02PM (#12492204)
I don't think it will ever be possible to prove that given piece of hardware contains no malware. Still, there is demand for transparency and product that comes with manufacturer's warranty that says "malware not included". People believe this could lead to some good results, such as better hardware and lower probability of bugged computer.
Re:Experiments with disabling the ME on Sandybridge x230 by mrswag on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @03:50AM (#12494868)
It's theoretically possible, provided you have a small trusted circuit. It's an active research area. The basic idea is to use multiple separate, untrusted chips and have them do multiparty computation, coordinated by the small trusted circuit.

With testing amplification, you can then set an upper bound on the probability that the chip will run a backdoor.