Edward Snowden makes 'moral' case for presidential pardon

Re:Edward Snowden makes 'moral' case for presidential pardon by tanderson92 on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @11:33AM (#12489148)

It is always amazing to me when politicians say they "regret" an action, or "take responsibility" for a vote (see Clinton's statements on Iraq since 2014).

What does it even mean, apart from lip service to those who disagree with their vote? Politicians don't hold personal responsibility for the fallout of their policies, so it is just rhetoric intended to neutralize your negative opinions of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Edward Snowden makes 'moral' case for presidential pardon by Kadin on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @11:58AM (#12489458)

> What does it even mean, apart from lip service to those who disagree with their vote?

Just what you suspect it does: nothing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Edward Snowden makes 'moral' case for presidential pardon by rayiner on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @12:37PM (#12489900)

Even if you think the apology was insincere and did nothing to ameliorate the harm of the pardon, at the very least the fact that Clinton was forced to apologize is evidence that, contrary to the assertion above, political reaction is "important in granting pardons."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Edward Snowden makes 'moral' case for presidential pardon by harryh on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @12:00PM (#12489490)

Have you ever made a mistake? Did you apologize afterwards? Was that apology meaningful?

[ Parent | on HN ]