Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat
by hx87 on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:40PM
(#12482979)
A diet of animal parts (i.e. ALL of the animal, not just muscle) and leafy, non-starchy plants, is perfectly keto-compliant. Who says that a low-carb diet excludes plants?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat
by LordHumungous on Monday September 12, 2016 @06:11PM
(#12484112)
I'm pretty sure that's why low carb/keto diets work: they force you to avoid most processed junk food. However I don't think it has to do with carbs. I'm pretty sure you could get the same results eating potatoes, corn, beans, rice, etc.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat
by fps on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @09:01AM
(#12487777)
4 years ago I did a strict no-carb diet for about a year and lost 40 lbs. Then I started eating only starches I had cooked myself - potatoes, rice, beans, some pasta, etc. I gained it all back. I'm doing it again now and have lost 35 of my original 40, but I have no intention of re-introducing starches into my diet afterwards. Aside from the weight control benefits, keeping starches out of my diet makes me feel so much healthier, it's insane. I eat lots of green vegetables, nuts, meat, eggs and a small amount of full-fat dairy. Cured or salted meat doesn't seem to be any worse than fresh meat, but most of what I eat is just plain fresh grilled steak or chicken.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat
by hx87 on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @10:54AM
(#12488788)
I'm pretty sure you can't. Potatoes, corn, and rice don't make you feel full and satisfied for long, and the surprisingly high rates of diabetes and obesity in low-income agricultural communities suggests that their high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets aren't exactly the healthiest.